Who is the most important anarchist?
Who is the most important anarchist?
People say that Bakunin's teachings are the most important,while others say Proudhorn,and Kropotkin.It also goes on to Makhuno,and Emma Goldman,and even Leo Toltsy.But whose ideas are the most important,or all they all equal?

Anarcho-Edge- ___________________________

- Tendency: Irish nationalism
Posts: 32
Reputation: 17
Join date: 2011-12-21
Location: Hell a.k.a Delaware
Re: Who is the most important anarchist?
It really depends on which school of anarchist thought you adhere to. If you're an individualist anarchist, I'd say Proudhon's work was the most influential. The most important collectivist anarchist, in my opinion, was Bakunin.
_________________
"The dogma of human equality is no part of Communism . . . the formula of Communism: 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs', would be nonsense, if abilities were equal."
—J. B. S. Haldane

"Nationality. . . is a historic, local fact which, like all real and harmless facts, has the right to claim general acceptance. . . Every people, like every person, is involuntarily that which it is and therefore has a right to be itself. . . Nationality is not a principle; it is a legitimate fact, just as individuality is. Every nationality, great or small, has the incontestable right to be itself, to live according to its own nature. This right is simply the corollary of the general principle of freedom."
—Mikhail Bakunin
—Mikhail Bakunin

Anarchist ideology
It seems to me that the majority of people who resent socialist ideologies are quick to call anarchy out, insincerely, as a non-democratic and mindless ideology engulfed in destruction. I think it is beyond apparent that this claim is false and is a misnomer. My troubles of this lie here: How can the bourgeois definition easily be refuted as to determine the real anarchist outlook?

Egalitarian- ___________________________

- Tendency: Revolutionary Syndicalist
Posts: 77
Reputation: 40
Join date: 2011-07-21
Location: Toronto
Re: Who is the most important anarchist?
Egalitarian wrote:How can the bourgeois definition easily be refuted as to determine the real anarchist outlook?
It will never happen for the majority of people unless the media paints a pretty picture of Anarchism, which they won't as Anarchists are a threat to the owners of the media and anyone who else who holds power/influence. Personally I think that people cannot claim anything if they know nothing about the topic they are discussing e.g. Communism is bad. A prime example because the people who say that have no idea what Communism is and do not know that it has never been implemented as of this moment. Same with Anarchism.
EDIT: Same as Anarchism in terms of not knowing what it is about.
Last edited by Left Adherent on Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:11 am; edited 1 time in total

Left Adherent- ___________________________

- Tendency: Exploring Anarcho-Communism
Posts: 15
Reputation: 15
Join date: 2012-08-18
Age: 17
Re: Who is the most important anarchist?
Egalitarian wrote:It seems to me that the majority of people who resent socialist ideologies are quick to call anarchy out, insincerely, as a non-democratic and mindless ideology engulfed in destruction. I think it is beyond apparent that this claim is false and is a misnomer. My troubles of this lie here: How can the bourgeois definition easily be refuted as to determine the real anarchist outlook?
The trouble is that people associate the word "anarchy" with disorder and chaos (e.g., 'the region has descended into a state of anarchy and barbarism'), thereby increasing the difficulty in having a sensible discussion regarding the theory. Nevertheless, it's useful to begin explaining anarchist political philosophy by invoking Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's quote, "liberty: not the daughter, but the mother of order"—in other words, legitimate order arises organically from conditions of genuine liberty (anarchism), not from state mandate. From there I would proceed to explain the principles of self-management, free association, and mutual aid.
_________________
"The dogma of human equality is no part of Communism . . . the formula of Communism: 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs', would be nonsense, if abilities were equal."
—J. B. S. Haldane

"Nationality. . . is a historic, local fact which, like all real and harmless facts, has the right to claim general acceptance. . . Every people, like every person, is involuntarily that which it is and therefore has a right to be itself. . . Nationality is not a principle; it is a legitimate fact, just as individuality is. Every nationality, great or small, has the incontestable right to be itself, to live according to its own nature. This right is simply the corollary of the general principle of freedom."
—Mikhail Bakunin
—Mikhail Bakunin


Lumpenproletariat- ___________________________

- Tendency: Marxist, Anti-Nationalist
Posts: 16
Reputation: 13
Join date: 2012-09-18
Location: Germany
Similar topics» Important information
» IMPORTANT DATES IN THE HISTORY OF JAMAICA
» Important message from Elie Wiesel and others concerned about Ahmadinejad
» Important Places In Korea Concerning Canadian UN Forces
» Management Cybernetics & Chaos Theory (VERY IMPORTANT)
» IMPORTANT DATES IN THE HISTORY OF JAMAICA
» Important message from Elie Wiesel and others concerned about Ahmadinejad
» Important Places In Korea Concerning Canadian UN Forces
» Management Cybernetics & Chaos Theory (VERY IMPORTANT)
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum





